Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!

On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:09:06 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:

Chris Thompson wrote:

Ron Dean wrote:

jillery wrote:

On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:04:32 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> posted yet another self-parody:
>

jillery wrote:

On Sat, 16 Mar 2024 18:37:55 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> posted yet another self-parody:
>
<snip pointless digressions>
>

prove that Life appeared not from
non- life which is exactly what a believer would predict.

>
I suppose, if your "believer" believes the Bible stories of God
breathing life into dust.
>

I heard this statement as a child. Not sure where in the Bible it's
found. But you as an atheist naturally would rather die before
admitting
there may be a God (designer).

>
>
Since you mention it:
>
Genesis 2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and
breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living
soul.
>
Genesis 3:19 for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.
>
As someone you repeatedly and baselessly and pointlessly claim to be
an atheist, that I quote the Bible to you raises your words to scorn.
>

Even though I have thought of you as an atheist, This was the only time
I actually expressed this thought.

>
>
Even if your comment above was technically correct, which it isn't,
that you assert the point even once, and without apology, is
sufficient to raise your words to scorn.
>
Worse, you repeatedly and baselessly and pointlessly conflate
evolutionists and atheists.
>
Worse, you now evade the original point, that Bible believers claim
life comes from non-life.
>
Worse, once again you post a lie trivially proved false:
**********************************
From: Ron Dean <rondean-noreply@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Masterclass
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 12:28:33 -0500
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <6nOxN.99620$STLe.82442@fx34.iad>
>

As an atheist, for you to bear false witness against someone has no
consequence for you.

*************************************
>
Is it your intent to continue to lie for God?  If so, you're doing a
great job.
>

I never deliberately lie. I been mistaken, but they were honest mistakes.

 
That itself is a lie.
 

It's so easy to accuse anyone of anything so long as you don't have to
back up your accusation/charge.
When you don't - this amounts to you bearing false witness.

Incorrect.  I have documented this particular lie in this very thread.
At best, your "honest mistake" is instead a repetitive falsehood you
post mindlessly out of habit, despite having been corrected multiple
times by me and others. 

That you continue to fail to acknowledge your mistake, nevermind
correct it, is what puts the lie to your claim of "honest", and makes
your comment a deliberate falsehood/untruth with intent to deceive aka
lie.

<snip uncommented text>

--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge