Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!

*Hemidactylus* wrote:

Mark Isaak <specimenNOSPAM@curioustaxon.omy.net> wrote:

On 3/25/24 10:26 AM, Ron Dean wrote:

Mark Isaak wrote:

On 3/23/24 4:31 PM, *Hemidactylus* wrote:

Ron Dean <rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:

Mark Isaak wrote:

>

[snip

>
And what about people for whom theism is their greatest motivator,
such
as Obama bin Laden? Cynicism seems a rational response.
>

Are you suggesting that Obama bin Laden is typical of Islam? If so,
you're probably right.

>
My apologies to Mark as I just Chez Watted this without realizing
Mark had
originally posted Osama bin Laden and in Ron Dean’s reply Mark’s
spelling
morphed to Obama bin Laden matching Ron Dean’s spelling. I wonder
what that
indicates about Ron Dean…

>
Even without the typo, Ron's reply shows that he is grossly bigoted
against Arabs and Moslems. The typo suggests that Blacks and Democrats
may be added to the list.
>

Here you are so unfair.  It's easy to make accusations and charges
without even attempting to support them. This in and of itself
demonstrates your extreme bias and hatred of anyone with a
point of view, opinion or belief different from yours.

>
The support for your bigotry against Moslems is in your own post, and
that bigotry in turn is support for a suggestion of further bigotry. I
must admit that I had not considered the intervention of a
spell-checker. I have never known a spell-checker, uninvited, to alter
text that the user did not type himself.
>

Yes that’s a bit sus.
 

Hy make so much over a extremely minor error, which was unforeseen, overlooked and not meant?
That's really biased!