Liste des Groupes | Revenir à t origins |
John Harshman wrote:The nature opinion piece explaining the issue is from 2014. It has never amounted to anything because it isn't much of an issue.On 3/26/24 11:29 AM, Ron Dean wrote:Considering the article is almost two years old, youJohn Harshman wrote:>On 3/26/24 11:00 AM, Ron Dean wrote:>"A new wave of scientists argues that mainstream evolutionary theory needs an urgent overhaul. Their opponents have dismissed them as misguided careerists – and the conflict may determine the future of biology....Strange as it sounds, scientists still do not know the answers to some of the most basic questions about how life on Earth evolved. Take eyes, for instance. Where do they come from, exactly? The usual explanation of how we got these stupendously complex organs rests.Thanks for asking. The answer is "no".
>
"https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jun/28/do-we-need-a-new-theory-of-evolution
DOES EVOLUTION THEORY NEED A RETHINK?
>
https://www.nature.com/articles/514161a
>
The question was not mine!
Do you question the motives of scientist who think it is? If so on what basis
I don't have any idea of their motives. I was just answering the question.
merely affirmed the answer
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.