Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?
De : rokimoto (at) *nospam* cox.net (RonO)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 27. Mar 2024, 12:25:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uu0vne$2pq13$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/26/2024 2:57 PM, Pro Plyd wrote:
John Harshman wrote:
On 3/26/24 11:29 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
John Harshman wrote:
On 3/26/24 11:00 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
"A new wave of scientists argues that mainstream evolutionary theory needs an urgent overhaul. Their opponents have dismissed them as misguided careerists – and the conflict may determine the future of biology....Strange as it sounds, scientists still do not know the answers to some of the most basic questions about how life on Earth evolved. Take eyes, for instance. Where do they come from, exactly? The usual explanation of how we got these stupendously complex organs rests.
>
"https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jun/28/do-we-need-a-new-theory-of-evolution
DOES EVOLUTION THEORY NEED A RETHINK?
>
https://www.nature.com/articles/514161a
>
Thanks for asking. The answer is "no".
 >
The question was not mine!
Do you question the motives of scientist who think it is? If so on what basis
>
I don't have any idea of their motives. I was just answering the question.
 Considering the article is almost two years old, you
merely affirmed the answer
 
The nature opinion piece explaining the issue is from 2014.  It has never amounted to anything because it isn't much of an issue.
Ron Okimoto

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Mar 24 * IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?27Ron Dean
26 Mar 24 +* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?7John Harshman
26 Mar 24 i`* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?6Ron Dean
26 Mar 24 i `* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?5John Harshman
26 Mar 24 i  +* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?3Pro Plyd
26 Mar 24 i  i+- Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?1Ron Dean
27 Mar 24 i  i`- Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?1RonO
27 Mar 24 i  `- Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?1Ron Dean
27 Mar 24 +* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?2*Hemidactylus*
27 Mar 24 i`- Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?1Ron Dean
27 Mar 24 +* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?6jillery
27 Mar 24 i`* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?5FromTheRafters
27 Mar 24 i `* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?4John Harshman
29 Mar 24 i  `* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?3jillery
29 Mar 24 i   `* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?2John Harshman
30 Mar 24 i    `- Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?1jillery
27 Mar 24 +- Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?1RonO
27 Mar 24 `* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?10Burkhard
27 Mar 24  `* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?9John Harshman
27 Mar 24   `* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?8Burkhard
28 Mar 24    `* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?7John Harshman
28 Mar 24     `* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?6Burkhard
28 Mar 24      +* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?2John Harshman
28 Mar 24      i`- Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?1Ernest Major
28 Mar 24      `* Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?3J. J. Lodder
28 Mar 24       +- Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?1Athel Cornish-Bowden
28 Mar 24       `- Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?1Martin Harran

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal