Sujet : Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?
De : 69jpil69 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (jillery)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 29. Mar 2024, 04:25:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : What are you looking for?
Message-ID : <o3dc0jp53pch8muon8mgnphplrg5fm7r8q@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:35:36 -0700, John Harshman
<
john.harshman@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/27/24 4:39 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
jillery pretended :
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:00:17 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
>
"A new wave of scientists argues that mainstream evolutionary theory
needs an urgent overhaul. Their opponents have dismissed them as
misguided careerists – and the conflict may determine the future of
biology....Strange as it sounds, scientists still do not know the
answers to some of the most basic questions about how life on Earth
evolved. Take eyes, for instance. Where do they come from, exactly?
The usual explanation of how we got these stupendously complex organs
rests.
>
"https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jun/28/do-we-need-a-new-theory-of-evolution
>
>
Yet another embarrassing typo; you should quite while you're behind.
Hmmm.
There's some rule that every spelling flame must contain at least one typo.
Right, he mis-spelled "hmm".
-- To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge
IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?
Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?