Sujet : Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?
De : john.harshman (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John Harshman)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 29. Mar 2024, 16:20:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : University of Ediacara
Message-ID : <ZPOcncIC4tG6QZv7nZ2dnZfqlJ8AAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/28/24 8:25 PM, jillery wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:35:36 -0700, John Harshman
<john.harshman@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/27/24 4:39 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
jillery pretended :
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:00:17 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
>
"A new wave of scientists argues that mainstream evolutionary theory
needs an urgent overhaul. Their opponents have dismissed them as
misguided careerists – and the conflict may determine the future of
biology....Strange as it sounds, scientists still do not know the
answers to some of the most basic questions about how life on Earth
evolved. Take eyes, for instance. Where do they come from, exactly?
The usual explanation of how we got these stupendously complex organs
rests.
>
"https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jun/28/do-we-need-a-new-theory-of-evolution
>
>
Yet another embarrassing typo; you should quite while you're behind.
>
Hmmm.
>
There's some rule that every spelling flame must contain at least one typo.
Right, he mis-spelled "hmm".
Quit so.
IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?
Re: IS A NEW THEORY OF EVOLUTION NEEDED?