Re: What is YOUR view?

On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:13:38 -0500, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by RonO <rokimoto@cox.net>:

On 3/31/2024 3:39 PM, JTEM wrote:

RonO wrote:
 

We are putting out a lot of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.  Some
people worry about methane, but the effect is likely negligible
because methane doesn't last very long in the atmosphere.  We likely
did accelerate global warming with our increased output of carbon
dioxide, but we did it at a time when global temperatures had already
been increasing for thousands of years.

 
Not that you give a shit about science or anything else but, there is
not Gwobull Warling at all. You're comparing the Holocene to itself
and declaring that it doesn't match.
 
Don't deny it -- though you already have but -- you are comparing the
Holocene to itself and declaring that it doesn't match. This is as far
from science as you nutters can get. But, if you compare our present
interglacial, the Holocene, to the previous one then it's cold. Sea
level is maybe 16 feet too low.
 
So a reasonable comparison says it's too cold, an unreasonable,
unscientific comparison says it's hot, but even then only if we
ignore the natural variations within an interglacial. The
Medieval Warm Period, for example, was WARMER, as the name would
imply. As was the Roman Warm Period, again noting the name.
 
So, you're precious Gwobull Warbling cherry picks a low point, or
just ignores data entirely, only to invent a "High" which isn't
high at all, but actually pretty low.
 
"Ah, science!
 
Your second MASSIVELY stupid error was in ignoring the so called
"Solutions." If your precious Gwobull Warbling were real then all
the "Solutions" would map to the problem -- "too much CO2" -- and
thus lower it. But that's not what happened all all.
 
Your precious Gwobull Warbling scriptures have AGW kicking off
back in the 19th century when emissions hit 1 billion tons. Well,
absolutely ZERO percent of that CO2 has ever left the atmosphere,
according to your fake "Science" -- it lasts 300 to a thousand
years, according to NASA -- but in the mean time the growth in
human population alone accounts for easily in excess of twice that!
 
Just humans breathing -- and at this point there's something like
8 billion of us -- we produce easily more than TWICE the amount of
CO2 your scriptures claim got the whole AGW ball rolling in the
first place.
 
Do the math. Ask a grownup to show you how.
 
Google for the start date of your precious gwobull warbling.
 
Google how much CO2 humans exhale.
 
Google the size of the human population at that time.
 
Google the size of the human population at the present.
 
Subtract the population at the start of your precious AGW from
the present, then multiply by the amount of CO2 each human
produces.
 
There. If Gwobull Warbling is real (and it's not) then we
have slaughter most of humanity -- roughly 15 out of every
16 people must be executed. THEN we can have some form of
industrialization while keeping emissions at or below 1
billion tons.
 
REALITY:  The same self imposed elite who order you to shit
yourself in fright over Gwobull Warbling won't even discuss
banning private aviation. Flying First Class on a commercial
airliner is "Going to far." that's "Too much of a sacrifice"
for them.
 
Do the math.

>
Before you do that, you should try to relate your response to what I
actually wrote.  No one can do that for your post because you removed
just about everything and left just some uncontroversial facts.  If you
are responding to the video, you should make that clear, but you seem to
have snipped out that part of the post.
>

Exactly as has been his standard MO for years, and the
reason why any response to him is a waste of time.

>

--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov