Re: What is YOUR view?

On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 11:18:19 -0400, JTEM trolled:

 jillery wrote:
>

The crisis is from not just  the high levels of CO2 and CH4 but also
CO2's unprecedented rapid rise, making it difficult for both nature
and civilization to adapt to AGW changes.

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCt2MhOzWVE>

How long did it take the climate to warm up for the Medieval Warm
Period, exactly?

Specify exactly how Medieval Warm Period is especially relevant.

Do you have any clue what so ever? Of course not. You're simply
regurgitating the media, convincing yourself that it's "Science,"
and believing this makes you intelligent.
>

If you think past glaciers were no fun, just consider living during
the Permian Extinction.  AGW deniers would have us do nothing until
the world's continents become deserts and the world's oceans become
anoxic swamps.

>
As I pointed out, JUST FROM THE RISE IN HUMAN POPULATION, we are
producing more than twice as much CO2 as the fantasy claims to
have gotten your AGW started in the first place, back in the 19th
century, JUST FROM BREATHING.

The above presumes the rise in human population appeared by magic,
perhaps from God breathing life into dust.

Humans breathing produce more than TWICE AS MUCH CO2 as your
climate scriptures claim was enough to start AGW, looking at the
rise in human population.
>
Your own narrative is self refuting.
>
Not only would it be pointless to take any action but, the planet
would be better off if it were warmer. The Quaternary Period is an
ice age. The planet was warmer before it started. Ending the ice
age means making it warmer. Not ending the ice age means that
mountains of ice will once again scrape the northern hemisphere
clean.

The cite you deleted makes clear there's a difference between ice ages
and interglacials.  Try reading for comprehension instead.

--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge