Sujet : Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding
De : me (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Athel Cornish-Bowden)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 04. Apr 2024, 09:40:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : University of Ediacara
Message-ID : <l777c8FemltU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-04-04 06:45:56 +0000, Ernest Major said:
On 04/04/2024 03:54, panther2020 wrote:
As for Danny Vendramini, you have to remember that Neanderthal dna is described as roughly halfway between ours and that of a chimpanzee, and a bit closer to that of the chimp. You need to ask yourself what you think such a creature would look like....
Like Lucy?
However, the estimates are the the common ancestor of us and Neandertals lived 500,000 years ago, and the common ancestor of us and chimpanzees an order of magnitude earlier. Whoever described Neandertal DNA as "roughly halfway between ours and that of a chimpanzee, and
a bit closer to that of the chimp" was seriously inaccurate.
Like everything else in panther2020's posts.
-- Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly in England until 1987.
Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding
Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding