Sujet : Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding
De : {$to$} (at) *nospam* meden.demon.co.uk (Ernest Major)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 04. Apr 2024, 21:29:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uun2ju$s3h7$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 04/04/2024 09:47, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
Are we as closely related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae as we are to bananas?
We're more closely related to S. cerevisiae than we are to Musa paradisiaca. The location of the eukaryote root has been disputed, but it's generally agreed that Holomycota and Holozoa form a clade that's on one side of the root, and Viridiplantae are on the other side.
-- alias Ernest Major
Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding
Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding