Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding
De : ecphoric (at) *nospam* allspamis.invalid (*Hemidactylus*)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 05. Apr 2024, 02:36:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : University of Ediacara
Message-ID : <pxGdnc8FTKk4yJL7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Burkhard <b.schafer@ed.ac.uk> wrote:
panther2020 wrote:
 
We share around half of our genes with the ordinary banana...
 
That assuredly does not come from humans BREEDING with bananas...  It
most liikely comes from humans EATING bananas, pretty much forever, and
probably throughout the universe and not just on  this planet.
 
That over-complicates things, eating is not necessary. I mean,
have you ever noticed how much dogs look like their owners? That's
of course not because they eat each other, it is perfectly sufficient
to be exposed to each other's morphic fields.
 
Just try it out yourself: Stay for eight months or so next to a
banana, doing absolutely nothing else but looking at it. At the
end of that period, we can compare you and the banana, and I'm sure
that by that time you two will look much moe similar than before
 
I’ve heard that helps for penis size or at least more so than eating
bananas. Cucumbers though! More morphic resonance please. I tried to stare
at a blimp hangar in Pompano. It failed to take. When I tried to eat the
blimp the local authorities got all against the science.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Apr 24 * Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding17panther2020
3 Apr 24 +* Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding8Athel Cornish-Bowden
4 Apr 24 i+* Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding4RonO
4 Apr 24 ii`* Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding3Athel Cornish-Bowden
4 Apr 24 ii `* Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding2Ernest Major
5 Apr 24 ii  `- Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding1Athel Cornish-Bowden
4 Apr 24 i`* Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding3John Harshman
4 Apr 24 i `* Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding2*Hemidactylus*
5 Apr 24 i  `- Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding1John Harshman
3 Apr 24 +- Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding1*Hemidactylus*
3 Apr 24 +- Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding1Ernest Major
4 Apr 24 +* Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding4panther2020
4 Apr 24 i+* Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding2Ernest Major
4 Apr 24 ii`- Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding1Athel Cornish-Bowden
4 Apr 24 i`- Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding1*Hemidactylus*
5 Apr 24 `* Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding2Burkhard
5 Apr 24  `- Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding1*Hemidactylus*

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal