Sujet : Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding
De : me (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Athel Cornish-Bowden)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 05. Apr 2024, 08:26:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : University of Ediacara
Message-ID : <l79nclFq7adU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-04-04 20:29:50 +0000, Ernest Major said:
On 04/04/2024 09:47, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
Are we as closely related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae as we are to bananas?
We're more closely related to S. cerevisiae than we are to Musa paradisiaca. The location of the eukaryote root has been disputed, but it's generally agreed that Holomycota and Holozoa form a clade that's on one side of the root, and Viridiplantae are on the other side.
No doubt you're right. I should have checked before pronouncing on our cousin Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
-- athel cb : Biochemical Evolution, Garland Science, 2016
Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding
Re: Common genes do not imply cross-species (human/hominid) breeding