Sujet : Re: Evidence v Conclusions
De : j.nobel.daggett (at) *nospam* gmail.com (LDagget)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 06. Apr 2024, 16:16:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <481bea446c3d6f3930fed32d0a94e807@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Richmond wrote:
j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget) writes:
That's quite false as there exist many different independent lines
of evidence for the existence of electrons beyond modeling the flow of
electricity.
Yes there are, but people often offer electricity, or worse still,
television, as evidence.
>
Are you even aware of who JJ Thomson is? If so, do you understand
Oh it's you again. Are you even aware the standard model is a model?
Cathode ray tubes don't produce models, they produce electron beams.
The data interpretation doesn't require the standard model of particle
physics. Neither do slit experiments. What it looks like is there's
a lack of evidence that you understand either bit of evidence. Or have ever seen that evidence? I'm guessing you never looked. I guess as long as you play see no, hear no, speak no games, your
assertion will survive your personal belief system.