Re: Evidence v Conclusions

Richmond wrote:
>

j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget) writes:

>

That's quite false as there exist many different independent lines
of evidence for the existence of electrons beyond modeling the flow of
electricity.

>

Yes there are, but people often offer electricity, or worse still,
television, as evidence.

>

>
Are you even aware of who JJ Thomson is? If so, do you understand

>

Oh it's you again. Are you even aware the standard model is a model?

>
Cathode ray tubes don't produce models, they produce electron beams.
>
The data interpretation doesn't require the standard model of particle
physics. Neither do slit experiments. What it looks like is there's
a lack of evidence that you understand either bit of evidence. Or have
ever seen that evidence? I'm guessing you never looked. I guess as
long as you play see no, hear no, speak no games, your
assertion will survive your personal belief system.