Re: Evidence v Conclusions

*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> writes:
>

Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote:

j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget) writes:
 

Richmond wrote:
 

j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget) writes:

 

That's quite false as there exist many different independent lines
of evidence for the existence of electrons beyond modeling the flow of
electricity.

 

Yes there are, but people often offer electricity, or worse still,
television, as evidence.

 

 
Are you even aware of who JJ Thomson is? If so, do you understand

 

Oh it's you again. Are you even aware the standard model is a model?

 
Cathode ray tubes don't produce models, they produce electron beams.
 
The data interpretation doesn't require the standard model of particle
physics. Neither do slit experiments. What it looks like is there's
a lack of evidence that you understand either bit of evidence. Or have
ever seen that evidence? I'm guessing you never looked. I guess as
long as you play see no, hear no, speak no games, your
assertion will survive your personal belief system.

 
What are you talking about you gormless fuckwit?
 

And there we have it.

>
The problem with this group is people argue with imaginary people. You
see at the end there he talks about my personal belief system, and yet
he has no idea what it is. I said that people interpret electricity as
evidence of electrons, and he says that is false, but I know it is true,
I have spoken to such people.
>