Sujet : Re: Evidence v Conclusions
De : dnomhcir (at) *nospam* gmx.com (Richmond)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 08. Apr 2024, 12:55:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Frantic
Message-ID : <86frvwukz7.fsf@example.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
jillery <
69jpil69@gmail.com> writes:
The above is not nonsense. You think it is nonsense because you don't
understand.
>
>
I understand quite well.
It cannot be nonsense then can it?
The cited comments are mindless and infantile.
The usual ad hominems, being the last resort of the incompetent.
>
Your confusion about these things is likely a result of your ignorance
of relevant facts.
More ad hominems. You are either a troll or you have been in this
newsgroup so long you think this is normal behaviour.
Evidence v Conclusions
Re: Evidence v Conclusions