Re: Evidence v Conclusions

On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 12:55:56 +0100, Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote:

jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> writes:
>
>

The above is not nonsense. You think it is nonsense because you don't
understand.

>
>
I understand quite well.

>
It cannot be nonsense then can it?

Recognizing nonsense does not convert nonsense into sense.
"2+2=spaghetti" is analogous to the cited comments.

The cited comments are mindless and infantile.

>
The usual ad hominems, being the last resort of the incompetent.

Conclusions about comments are in no way ad hominens.  You are either
a troll, or you have conflated the two for so long you think this is
normal behavior.  That you make no effort to support your baseless
opinions is strong evidence of the former.

Your confusion about these things is likely a result of your ignorance
of relevant facts.

>
More ad hominems. You are either a troll or you have been in this
newsgroup so long you think this is normal behaviour.

Yeah, I get such ad hominems a lot from willfully stupid trolls. 

--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge