Sujet : Re: The unravelling of OoL
De : arkalen (at) *nospam* proton.me (Arkalen)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 12. Apr 2024, 17:11:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uvbmeq$2eojv$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
On 02/03/2024 02:13, MarkE wrote:
Here is further evidence that OoL research is really only at base camp, if that. Excitement and optimism over reported progress needs to be tempered thus:
"Explaining isolated steps on the road from simple chemicals to complex living organisms is not enough. Looking at the big picture could help to bridge rifts in this fractured research field."
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00544-4
snip
Okay you know what I've now seen three different sources describing this article as confirming ID/debunking OoL research and that *look* like they read it (as in, they quote from it & claim to have read the full thing) so I'd really like to see for myself what it says. Anybody have a subscription to Nature & feel generous with PDFs?