Re: West Virginia creationism

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: West Virginia creationism
De : martinharran (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Martin Harran)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 25. Apr 2024, 08:33:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : University of Ediacara
Message-ID : <6k0k2jdth5sdt78ur1460ca5cs54vrked5@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:16:59 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:

Martin Harran wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 03:03:03 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
 
Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 00:25:20 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Martin Harran wrote:
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:41:29 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[...]
>
Beneficial mutations are rarely observed. The defective mutations are
overwhelming the beneficial mutations, as evidenced by the increasing
list of genetic disorders. Perhaps, this explains the 99% extinction
rate of all life forms that ever lived as observed or recorded in the
fossil record, as well as the numbers of the species become extinct
>
That doesn't say much for the intelligence of your designer. How long
would a designer with that failure rate survive in your industry?
>
Things change, new and better designs things just go downhill because of
the second law. There is in companies a deliberate "fail rate" so new
products to sell.
>
Apparently planned obsolescence is yet another thing of which you have
a very poor grasp. To the extent that it exists [1], it is not a
process intended to make products go *extinct*, it is one that is
intended to encourage consumers to purchase the newest model of the
product with some apparent extra features.
>
[1] ISTM, a lot less prevalent than is commonly thought. Somebody buys
a new laptop or phone and it seems really fast; two years later, it
seems to have slowed down considerably and the user blames this on a
deliberate policy of planned obsolescence by the manufacturer - they
don't take into account the amount of garbage they have collected on
the laptop or phone over the intervening two years.
  
[2] I say "apparent" because some of these claimed features are little
more than marketing hype. Increasing the resolution on a phone camera
from 12mp to 50mp will make no difference whatsoever to the vast
majority of phone users except to make them have to invest in
additional storage.
>
With the DNA coded information due to mutations (which are real) become
increasingly less perfect when passed down to their offspring the
defective genes are always down to the offspring never reversed; with
the passage of time, the genome may  just become so overburden with
defective genetics - bad mutations that failure to reproduce becomes
inevitable. Maybe there is a loss of sexual drive, or instinct, all of
which is expressed by genetics. As a species age, perhaps like human
males species reach an age when sex desire dies and offsprings cannot
happen.
>
Where does your intelligent designer fit into that process?
>
So, you agree - I fell out of my chair I was so shocked!
 
If you are accepting planned obsolescence is yet another thing of
which you have a very poor grasp, then yes, we are in agreement about
that.
 
If you go back
in tine to one's grandparents their genome had fewer deleterious
mutations than ours: going backwards generation after generation after
generation, the genome of each preceding generation had ever fewer
harmful mutations, By going back say to the earliest members of their
kind (family) their genome must have been far closer to perfect than any
decedent generations.
 
In what way do you think humans millions of years ago were more
"perfect" than we are?
 
Millions of years ago???! I think each succeeding generation is less
perfect due to increasing genetic defects.

Okay, if you don't like looking at millions of years, let's just look
at some changes in recent generations. Here is life expectancy on this
side of the Atlantic for 5 consecutive generations[1]:


My grandfather b 1865: 41 years
My father b 1915: 52 years
Me b 1951: 68 years
My son b 1973: 72 years
My grandson b 2016: 81 years


Life expectancy seems like a reasonable barometer of the overall
efficiency of our bodies and each generation has had an increase in it
over the previous generation. Would you care to explain how that
equates to decreasing perfection?

[1] Source:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1040159/life-expectancy-united-kingdom-all-time/

 
 From then, each succeeding generation the
deleterious mutations multiplied. I think possibly the proofreading and
repair, which was an elegantly and highly sophisticated design set up
for the best results, but over the vast spans of time even the P&R
mechanisms, which initially were perfect, but with the passage of time
even the P&R became less perfect due to bad mutations that slipped
passed the P&R mechanisms, consequent the P&R systems were affected. The
results we see today.
 
Again, I wish you would dress my actual question - where does your
intelligent designer fit into that process?
>
It seems that after the task was completed it said "It is done". and
left things with the capacity and ability  to take care of itself.



It
seems that the designer left the scene.

You have said elsewhere that you are now coming around to thinking
that the intelligent designer is indeed God. In that case, you
probably need to look outside your own culture [2] to find a God to
suit you because what you have been describing here and in another
post is at complete odds with the Christian God that most religious
people in the Western world generally subscribe to.

First of all, you have said that the original design is prone to
errors in successive generations; that inefficiency in design
contradicts the Christian notion of an *omnipotent* God.

Now, you suggest that the designer has left the scene and just left
life to its own devices. That contradicts the Christian belief in a
loving and caring God who continues to be part of everyday life.


[2] I realise that the USA is particularly prone to providing a home
to many weird cults and religious groups so perhaps you might find
something there to fulfill your idea of a God who wasn't all that
clever to start with and has abandoned us to devices.



Over time and the 2ND law
everything enters into downward tends, copying errors occur, things tend
to disintegrate and inevitably things move towards dissolution and
decay. I had some beautiful pine trees in my
acreage. But a patch died, collapsed and are in a process of decay. This
is typical. The same will
happen to our bodies.
 


Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Mar 24 * West Virginia creationism386RonO
22 Mar 24 `* Re: West Virginia creationism385Bob Casanova
22 Mar 24  +* Re: West Virginia creationism4Athel Cornish-Bowden
22 Mar 24  i+- Re: West Virginia creationism1Bob Casanova
23 Mar 24  i`* Re: West Virginia creationism2jillery
23 Mar 24  i `- Re: West Virginia creationism1RonO
30 Mar 24  `* Re: West Virginia creationism380Ron Dean
30 Mar 24   +* Re: West Virginia creationism370erik simpson
30 Mar 24   i`* Re: West Virginia creationism369Ron Dean
30 Mar 24   i +* Re: West Virginia creationism2Ron Dean
31 Mar 24   i i`- Re: West Virginia creationism1Ernest Major
30 Mar 24   i +- Re: West Virginia creationism1erik simpson
31 Mar 24   i +* Re: West Virginia creationism355jillery
2 Apr 24   i i`* Re: West Virginia creationism354Ron Dean
3 Apr 24   i i +* Re: West Virginia creationism252jillery
5 Apr 24   i i i+* Re: West Virginia creationism2JTEM
6 Apr 24   i i ii`- Re: West Virginia creationism1jillery
10 Apr 24   i i i`* Re: West Virginia creationism249Ron Dean
10 Apr 24   i i i `* Re: West Virginia creationism248Vincent Maycock
11 Apr 24   i i i  `* Re: West Virginia creationism247Ron Dean
12 Apr 24   i i i   `* Re: West Virginia creationism246Vincent Maycock
12 Apr 24   i i i    `* Re: West Virginia creationism245Ron Dean
12 Apr 24   i i i     +* Re: West Virginia creationism15Vincent Maycock
12 Apr 24   i i i     i+* Re: West Virginia creationism5Ron Dean
13 Apr 24   i i i     ii+* Re: West Virginia creationism3Vincent Maycock
14 Apr 24   i i i     iii`* Re: West Virginia creationism2Ron Dean
14 Apr 24   i i i     iii `- Re: West Virginia creationism1Vincent Maycock
20 Apr 24   i i i     ii`- Re: West Virginia creationism1Mark Isaak
13 Apr 24   i i i     i`* Re: West Virginia creationism9Bob Casanova
13 Apr 24   i i i     i +* Re: West Virginia creationism5Arkalen
13 Apr 24   i i i     i i`* Re: West Virginia creationism4Bob Casanova
10 May 24   i i i     i i `* Re: West Virginia creationism3Arkalen
11 May 24   i i i     i i  +- Re: West Virginia creationism1Bob Casanova
11 May 24   i i i     i i  `- Re: West Virginia creationism1jillery
14 Apr 24   i i i     i `* Re: West Virginia creationism3Ron Dean
14 Apr 24   i i i     i  `* Re: West Virginia creationism2Arkalen
15 Apr 24   i i i     i   `- Re: West Virginia creationism1Bob Casanova
13 Apr 24   i i i     `* Re: West Virginia creationism229Martin Harran
14 Apr 24   i i i      `* Re: West Virginia creationism228Ron Dean
14 Apr 24   i i i       +- Re: West Virginia creationism1Jim Jackson
17 Apr 24   i i i       +* Re: West Virginia creationism225Martin Harran
18 Apr 24   i i i       i`* Re: West Virginia creationism224Ron Dean
18 Apr 24   i i i       i +* Re: West Virginia creationism2Vincent Maycock
19 Apr 24   i i i       i i`- Re: West Virginia creationism1Athel Cornish-Bowden
22 Apr 24   i i i       i `* Re: West Virginia creationism221Martin Harran
22 Apr 24   i i i       i  `* Re: West Virginia creationism220Ron Dean
22 Apr 24   i i i       i   +* Re: West Virginia creationism199Vincent Maycock
26 Apr 24   i i i       i   i`* Re: West Virginia creationism198Ron Dean
26 Apr 24   i i i       i   i +- Re: West Virginia creationism1John Harshman
26 Apr 24   i i i       i   i +* Re: West Virginia creationism142Vincent Maycock
6 May 24   i i i       i   i i`* Re: West Virginia creationism141Ron Dean
7 May 24   i i i       i   i i `* Re: West Virginia creationism140Vincent Maycock
7 May 24   i i i       i   i i  +* Re: West Virginia creationism138Ron Dean
7 May 24   i i i       i   i i  i+* Re: West Virginia creationism136Vincent Maycock
8 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii`* Re: West Virginia creationism135Ron Dean
8 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii +* Re: West Virginia creationism5jillery
9 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii i`* Re: West Virginia creationism4Ron Dean
11 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii i `* Re: West Virginia creationism3jillery
13 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii i  `* Re: West Virginia creationism2Ron Dean
13 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii i   `- Re: West Virginia creationism1jillery
8 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii `* Re: West Virginia creationism129Vincent Maycock
8 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii  `* Re: West Virginia creationism128Ron Dean
8 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   +* Re: West Virginia creationism100Vincent Maycock
10 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i`* Re: West Virginia creationism99Ron Dean
10 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i +- Re: West Virginia creationism1John Harshman
10 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i +* Re: West Virginia creationism15Vincent Maycock
10 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i`* Re: West Virginia creationism14Ron Dean
11 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i +* Re: West Virginia creationism11Vincent Maycock
12 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i`* Re: West Virginia creationism10Ron Dean
12 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i +* Re: West Virginia creationism3Vincent Maycock
13 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i i`* Re: West Virginia creationism2Ron Dean
13 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i i `- Re: West Virginia creationism1Vincent Maycock
13 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i `* Re: West Virginia creationism6Burkhard
14 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  +- Re: West Virginia creationism1John Harshman
14 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  +- Re: West Virginia creationism1Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  +* Re: West Virginia creationism2William Hyde
15 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  i`- Re: West Virginia creationism1Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  `- Re: West Virginia creationism1Martin Harran
11 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i `* Re: West Virginia creationism2jillery
13 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i  `- Re: West Virginia creationism1Ron Dean
10 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i +* Re: West Virginia creationism79Burkhard
10 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i+- Re: West Virginia creationism1Athel Cornish-Bowden
10 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i`* Re: West Virginia creationism77Ron Dean
11 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i +* Re: West Virginia creationism65Chris Thompson
11 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i+* Re: West Virginia creationism2John Harshman
12 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i ii`- Re: West Virginia creationism1Chris Thompson
11 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i+* Re: West Virginia creationism6William Hyde
12 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i ii+* Re: West Virginia creationism2Chris Thompson
12 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i iii`- Re: West Virginia creationism1FromTheRafters
12 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i ii`* Re: West Virginia creationism3Ernest Major
12 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i ii `* Re: West Virginia creationism2erik simpson
12 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i ii  `- Re: West Virginia creationism1Bob Casanova
12 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i`* Re: West Virginia creationism56Ron Dean
13 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i `* Re: West Virginia creationism55Chris Thompson
13 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  +* Re: West Virginia creationism51Ron Dean
13 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  i`* Re: West Virginia creationism50Chris Thompson
13 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  i `* Re: West Virginia creationism49Ernest Major
14 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  i  `* Re: West Virginia creationism48Chris Thompson
14 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  i   `* Re: West Virginia creationism47Ernest Major
15 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  i    `* Re: West Virginia creationism46Ron Dean
16 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  i     `* Re: West Virginia creationism45Chris Thompson
14 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i i  `* Re: West Virginia creationism3Burkhard
12 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i +- Re: West Virginia creationism1Burkhard
14 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i i `* Re: West Virginia creationism10Martin Harran
10 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   i `* Re: West Virginia creationism3Burkhard
8 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   +* Re: West Virginia creationism14John Harshman
9 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   +- Re: West Virginia creationism1Ernest Major
13 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   +- Re: West Virginia creationism1Burkhard
14 May 24   i i i       i   i i  ii   `* Re: West Virginia creationism11Martin Harran
8 May 24   i i i       i   i i  i`- Re: West Virginia creationism1Ernest Major
8 May 24   i i i       i   i i  `- Re: West Virginia creationism1Ernest Major
26 Apr 24   i i i       i   i `* Re: West Virginia creationism54Ernest Major
23 Apr 24   i i i       i   +* Re: West Virginia creationism17jillery
25 Apr 24   i i i       i   `* Re: West Virginia creationism3Martin Harran
20 Apr 24   i i i       `- Re: West Virginia creationism1Mark Isaak
3 Apr 24   i i +- Re: West Virginia creationism1Burkhard
3 Apr 24   i i `* Re: West Virginia creationism100Ernest Major
31 Mar 24   i +* Re: West Virginia creationism4Mark Isaak
5 Apr 24   i `* Re: West Virginia creationism6Arkalen
30 Mar 24   +* Re: West Virginia creationism7Burkhard
3 Apr 24   `* Re: West Virginia creationism2Richmond

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal