Sujet : Re: The dangers of [p]seudoscience
De : 69jpil69 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (jillery)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 30. Apr 2024, 05:53:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : What are you looking for?
Message-ID : <r9u03jlsvkqh57svfd39h33dvu3rjmpvev@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:41:17 +0000, *Hemidactylus*
<
ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 01:01:22 +0000, *Hemidactylus*
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
some VERY bad things.
He's soliciting, even provoking an emotional reaction from
the viewer.
He's manipulating people!
Literally.
Yep
JTEM presents himself as a type specimen of what the video describes.
I'm surprised that doesn't give you pause, but I'm glad to give you
two something to agree about.
I snipped to make it “JTEM wrote some VERY bad things…” as this pretty much
encapsulates his obnoxious posting career here. You go and make it about
you…again. Weird.
Right, I made it about me by forcing y'all to exercise your inner
trolls. Jillery is bad, bad, bad, so very bad.
-- To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge
The dangers of [p]seudoscience
Re: The dangers of [p]seudoscience