Liste des Groupes | Revenir à t origins |
John Harshman wrote:Perhaps you should take a break from TO.On 4/30/24 4:27 AM, Ron Dean wrote:>John Harshman wrote:My sympathies. But now that you're back would you like to address any of the points you dismissed earlier?On 4/26/24 6:06 PM, Ron Dean wrote:I'm back. I got some bad news from my 6 months physical examine, and spent a few days in the hospital. I've had some health issues, but this latest diagnoses is the same condition that took my father's life. It's very concerning an depressing.Ernest Major wrote:Ernest had just made an attempt, above, to get the thread going somewhere, and your response is to bail? This says something about you, and it's not good.On 26/04/2024 02:31, Ron Dean wrote:This thread is going nowhere and I've some pressing issues I have to deal with. So, hopefully I'll be back soon.I think due to gradual increasing genetic errors and increase rate of deleterious mutations each generation becomes less fit than the preceding generation, so in the passing spans of time the genes of a species become less and less incapable of reproduction or species survival. This could account for many of 99%+ of of all species that ever lived that have gone extinct. Of course the dinosaurs became extinct due to a 6 mile diameter meteor striking the Earth. Also changing weather the coming and going of ice ages; as well massive volcano eruptions accounts for extinction of many species for example in Siberia.>
Are you taking a progressive creationist position, in which your Intelligent Designer is continuously creating species de novo? Or are you claiming that the current 10 million (+/- a lot) species biota is the remnant of a much richer biota of a billion species?
>
For your information, the conclusion drawn from the fossil record is that (for multicellular eukaryotes at least) species diversity has been generally increasing over time (though with big setbacks at times of mass extinction).
>
>
>
>
>
I dismissed, Although I do try to respond to questions, challenges and issues. I cannot address every comment that's presented due to time and my present concerns and interest. I'm not so sure of just how important anything I see on TO is to me, right now especially this thread. I never intentionally defended or supported West Virginia Creationism. But rather intelligent design has been my interest for decades.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.