Liste des Groupes | Revenir à t origins |
jillery wrote:<snip>On Sat, 4 May 2024 22:54:26 -0400, Ron Dean
And cdesign proponentsists have neither direct evidence demonstratingI read this entire article the direction of the article is directed
how genetic information came into existence, nor of a presumptive
purposeful designer of genetic information.
It's asserted that RNA must have come first because RNA possesses the
capacity to copy. And there is contraversy. The origin of the RNA itself
is unknown.
Controversy is easy to create using false claims as well as
unfalsifiable claims:
<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10058490/>
**********************************
Oligomerization of cyclic purine and pyrimidine nucleotides to yield
short RNA oligomers has also been demonstrated under various
conditions.
**********************************
towards life on other planets, but it does make an effort to account for
life on this planet, but it does not pretend that the origin of the RNA
molecule has been discovered.
So you are blowing smoke, trying to hide
the truth! Be honest!
>That's past history and another topic.
And this doesn't touch the cosmological constants and the
laws of physics or natural law; which supposedly can be explained by
applying natural processes and actions.
Yes, that's the only explanation you have provided so far. What's
your explanation based on ID?
But it's one that causes a
certain atheist some little concern.Another unsupported claim. My motives were never religious, but ratherThat's almost a direct quote from the Bible.It's saying, in different words almost exactly the same concept as the
>
scientific definition of a species. Do you know the most common
definition species?
>
"A species is a group of organisms that share a genetic heritage, are
able to interbreed, and to create offspring that are also fertile.
Different species are separated from each other by reproductive
barriers...mountain ranges... genetic barriers that do not allow for
reproduction between the two populations."
https://biologydictionary.net/species/>"A species (pl.: species) is often defined as the largest group of
organisms in which any two individuals of the appropriate sexes or
mating types can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual
reproduction"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species#Taxonomy_and_naming
>But I guess you've givenNo, I never did base my beliefs on religion, quite the contrary it's
up all pretense of not basing your beliefs on religion.
>
what I've learned from science that causes me to re-think religious ideas.
You keep claiming your beliefs are religion-free, yet almost all of
your claims were earlier asserted by those with expressed religious
motives. What are the odds you just happened to use the same false
facts and illogic?
based upon what I read in science papers and books.
In fact, before I
read a certain book on a dare, I was an evolutionist and agnostic.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.