Sujet : Re: Drake's equation
De : jtem01 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (JTEM)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 08. May 2024, 22:40:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Eek
Message-ID : <v1grg4$6kmb$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
vallor wrote:
And so we have arrived at the point where JTEM
can't abide _any_ discussion from jillery.
It's not a coincidence that the collective, posting as
jillary, says a lot of stupid shit and that JTEM
reacts negatively to stupid shit.
It's not a difficult concept going here...
Rather than (fail to) argue about the semantics
of "paradox"
It's not "Semantics," you twit. You either know
what a goddamn word means or you don't. And if you
do, USE IT PROPERLY!
Say things right. It matters. And if you think it
doesn't then just say that God created the earth
and life 6 thousand years ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation#Equation
Tried that. You oops I mean the collective, no, I
meant jillary shit itself over it.
How and why the Drake Equation is interesting is
how it illustrates just how easily it is to change
the numbers, just by plugging in different variables.
Here, and you I mean the collective no I mean jillary
reacted with another breakdown:
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/8eYUSpUSkGs/m/lkiijSIfAQAJhttps://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/Ch4ZdgHO0Fg/m/dSraz9ZMAAAJ-- https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
There is no such thing as a Fermi Paradox
Re: There is no such thing as a Fermi Paradox