Re: Drake's equation

On Wed, 8 May 2024 17:40:18 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> trolled:

 vallor wrote:
>

And so we have arrived at the point where JTEM
can't abide _any_ discussion from jillery.

Actually, JTEM can't abide _any_ discussion from _anybody_.

It's not a coincidence that the collective, posting as
jillary, says a lot of stupid shit and that JTEM
reacts negatively to stupid shit.
>
It's not a difficult concept going here...
>

Rather than (fail to) argue about the semantics
of "paradox"

>
It's not "Semantics," you twit. You either know
what a goddamn word means or you don't. And if you
do, USE IT PROPERLY!
>
Say things right. It matters. And if you think it
doesn't then just say that God created the earth
and life 6 thousand years ago.
>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation#Equation

>
Tried that. You oops I mean the collective, no, I
meant jillary shit itself over it.
>
How and why the Drake Equation is interesting is
how it illustrates just how easily it is to change
the numbers, just by plugging in different variables.
>
Here, and you I mean the collective no I mean jillary
reacted with another breakdown:
>
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/8eYUSpUSkGs/m/lkiijSIfAQAJ
>
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/Ch4ZdgHO0Fg/m/dSraz9ZMAAAJ

QED

--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge