Sujet : Re: Lenski experiments: an important correction
De : arkalen (at) *nospam* proton.me (Arkalen)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 11. May 2024, 10:54:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v1nf90$1vhcb$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
On 11/05/2024 11:27, jillery wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2024 23:22:32 +0100, Ernest Major
<{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote:
On 10/05/2024 23:00, Arkalen wrote:
On 10/05/2024 23:05, Ernest Major wrote:
On 10/05/2024 21:31, Arkalen wrote:
I recently found out that Richard Lenski of the eponymous long-term
E.coli evolution experiment had a blog, and in it I found a
correction I thought was relevant to the way those experiments are
typically invoked as evidence in evolution/creationism debates:
>
https://telliamedrevisited.wordpress.com/2024/04/01/a-small-correction/
>
I hope we'll all have the integrity to take this new information into
account properly.
>
Did you look at the date? I suspect it's an April Fool. (Or did you
identify it as an April Fool, and ran with it?)
>
I did eventually figure it out but I'm embarrassed to admit which
paragraph it was at.
>
I'd read the whole post before I figured it out. It didn't make sense,
which caused me to look at the context.
>
(also the previous post isn't at the same date but I also suspect isn't
completely in earnest. I think maybe Richard Lenski might be a funny guy)
>
(EDIT I'm keeping the previous parenthetical for integrity's sake but
the previous post actually *is* at the same date. How am I such a, um,
what's the term again, "hard-working student")
Yes, an understandable and simple misunderstanding; no need to assert
personal limitations here.
--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge
Yes, misunderstanding things is completely normal and human. That's why it's important to keep the possibility in mind when raising the emotional stakes of a discussion to avoid getting trapped in a cycle of escalation where admitting to a misunderstanding becomes impossible without losing face.