Sujet : Re: Lenski experiments: an important correction
De : 69jpil69 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (jillery)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 12. May 2024, 13:38:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : What are you looking for?
Message-ID : <70e14jlren1armmk4sgo6pf38ttn8esplg@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 11 May 2024 11:54:38 +0200, Arkalen <
arkalen@proton.me> wrote:
On 11/05/2024 11:27, jillery wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2024 23:22:32 +0100, Ernest Major
<{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote:
On 10/05/2024 23:00, Arkalen wrote:
On 10/05/2024 23:05, Ernest Major wrote:
On 10/05/2024 21:31, Arkalen wrote:
I recently found out that Richard Lenski of the eponymous long-term
E.coli evolution experiment had a blog, and in it I found a
correction I thought was relevant to the way those experiments are
typically invoked as evidence in evolution/creationism debates:
>
https://telliamedrevisited.wordpress.com/2024/04/01/a-small-correction/
>
I hope we'll all have the integrity to take this new information into
account properly.
>
Did you look at the date? I suspect it's an April Fool. (Or did you
identify it as an April Fool, and ran with it?)
>
I did eventually figure it out but I'm embarrassed to admit which
paragraph it was at.
>
I'd read the whole post before I figured it out. It didn't make sense,
which caused me to look at the context.
>
(also the previous post isn't at the same date but I also suspect isn't
completely in earnest. I think maybe Richard Lenski might be a funny guy)
>
(EDIT I'm keeping the previous parenthetical for integrity's sake but
the previous post actually *is* at the same date. How am I such a, um,
what's the term again, "hard-working student")
Yes, an understandable and simple misunderstanding; no need to assert
personal limitations here.
>
Yes, misunderstanding things is completely normal and human. That's why
it's important to keep the possibility in mind when raising the
emotional stakes of a discussion to avoid getting trapped in a cycle of
escalation where admitting to a misunderstanding becomes impossible
without losing face.
Try it sometime, if only for the novelty of the experience.
-- To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge