Re: feathers (and one bird)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: feathers (and one bird)
De : john.harshman (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John Harshman)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 13. May 2024, 14:09:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : University of Ediacara
Message-ID : <g2adnVZF3fpkjd_7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/13/24 2:22 AM, jillery wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2024 06:16:49 -0700, John Harshman
<john.harshman@gmail.com> wrote:
 
On 5/12/24 5:28 AM, jillery wrote:
On Sat, 11 May 2024 18:28:08 -0500, DB Cates <cates_db@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
On 2024-05-11 4:30 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
JTEM presented the following explanation :
    DB Cates wrote:
>
"In October 2022 a bird with the code name B6 set a new world record
that few people outside the field of ornithology noticed. Over the
course of 11 days, B6, a young Bar-tailed Godwit, flew from its
hatching ground in Alaska to its wintering ground in Tasmania,
covering 8,425 miles without taking a single break. For comparison,
there is only one commercial aircraft that can fly that far nonstop,
a Boeing 777 with a 213-foot wingspan and one of the most powerful
jet engines in the world. During its journey, B6—an animal that could
perch comfortably on your shoulder—did not land, did not eat, did not
drink and <i>did not stop flapping</i>, sustaining an average ground
speed of 30 miles per hour 24 hours a day as it winged its way to the
other end of the world.
>
It's not hard to imagine them tagging a bird, tracking it with GPS,
but to know that it was continuously flapping it's wings?
>
https://academic.oup.com/icb/article/48/1/134/627446
>
I suppose with a rigorous enough definition of "continuous beating" they
don't. But they are physically incapable of long gliding like an
albatross but it is likely they use continuous beating with occasional
short pauses, a common thing. But they know it never stopped or fed
(continuous tracking) and it can't land on water without dying (can't
feed and can't take off).
The only time I've ever seen a shorebird gliding is when it is coming in
for a landing.
--
>
>
Perhaps it was an African Gotwit.
>
Was that a joke of some kind? If so, what?
  How quickly you forget the classics:
 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8Rn_f75UHs>
So the spelling "Gotwit" was just a typo, then. That's what confused me.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 May 24 * feathers (and one bird)13DB Cates
11 May 24 +* Re: feathers (and one bird)11JTEM
11 May 24 i`* Re: feathers (and one bird)10FromTheRafters
12 May 24 i +- Re: feathers (and one bird)1JTEM
12 May 24 i `* Re: feathers (and one bird)8DB Cates
12 May 24 i  `* Re: feathers (and one bird)7jillery
12 May 24 i   +* Re: feathers (and one bird)4John Harshman
12 May 24 i   i+- Re: feathers (and one bird)1erik simpson
13 May 24 i   i`* Re: feathers (and one bird)2jillery
13 May 24 i   i `- Re: feathers (and one bird)1John Harshman
12 May 24 i   `* Re: feathers (and one bird)2erik simpson
14 May 24 i    `- Re: feathers (and one bird)1Kerr-Mudd, John
11 May 24 `- Re: feathers (and one bird)1Bob Casanova

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal