Re: West Virginia creationism

Martin Harran wrote:

On Tue, 14 May 2024 20:35:56 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
>

Martin Harran wrote:

On Fri, 10 May 2024 16:40:15 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
>

Burkhard wrote:

>
[...]
>

In fact, your opening gambit is directly expressed in the Bible: Judges
10:16 or Ecclesiastes 3:19: "For what happens to the children of man and
what happens to the beasts is the same; as one dies, so dies the other.
They all have the same breath"
>

I question that. But this is Old Testament which Christians turn to for
back ground,  but the Old Covenant contained in the Old Testament was
like a contract which was fulfilled by Jesus Christ and set aside. The
new Convent contained in the New Testament is the one Christians are under.

>
I'm still waiting for you to explain how you get from a God twiddling
with molecules and DNA to a God with whom we can have a personal
relationship; the type of God defined in both the Old and New
Testament; the same type of God defined by Stephen Meyer, one of the
most prominent proponents of ID, in his book 'Return of the God
Hypothesis'.
>

Not my call!

>
In other words, you can't. You appear to be in good company, none of
the leading proponents of ID seem able to explain it either.
>

There are no ID proponent on TO, that I see just me. Due in insults, castigation and character assassination, ID proponents are quick to leave TO. Except me,  so far I've been able to overlook it.

>
[...]
>

>