Liste des Groupes | Revenir à t origins |
On Wed, 15 May 2024 09:10:27 -0400, Ron DeanWere! That's the issue. This might be my last post for a while. I've been scheduled for a hospital visit tomorrow 10:30. Heart problems. I'll return as soon as I can.
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
Martin Harran wrote:I wasn't talking just about posters here, I was talking about peopleOn Tue, 14 May 2024 20:35:56 -0400, Ron DeanThere are no ID proponent on TO, that I see just me.
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
>Martin Harran wrote:>On Fri, 10 May 2024 16:40:15 -0400, Ron DeanNot my call!
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
>Burkhard wrote:>
[...]
>>In fact, your opening gambit is directly expressed in the Bible: JudgesI question that. But this is Old Testament which Christians turn to for
10:16 or Ecclesiastes 3:19: "For what happens to the children of man and
what happens to the beasts is the same; as one dies, so dies the other.
They all have the same breath"
>
back ground, but the Old Covenant contained in the Old Testament was
like a contract which was fulfilled by Jesus Christ and set aside. The
new Convent contained in the New Testament is the one Christians are under.
I'm still waiting for you to explain how you get from a God twiddling
with molecules and DNA to a God with whom we can have a personal
relationship; the type of God defined in both the Old and New
Testament; the same type of God defined by Stephen Meyer, one of the
most prominent proponents of ID, in his book 'Return of the God
Hypothesis'.
>
In other words, you can't. You appear to be in good company, none of
the leading proponents of ID seem able to explain it either.
>
like Phillip E. Johnson, co-founder of the Discovery Institute's
Center for Science and Culturen and known as 'the father of the
intelligent design movement' and Stephen C. Meyer who is one of the
most high profile advocates of ID and author of "Return of the God
Hypothesis: Three Scientific Discoveries That Reveal the Mind Behind
the Universe" his 3 "discoveries" almost exactly mirroring the
arguments that you make for ID - the origins of the Universe, DNA and
coding/intelligence, the Cambrian explosion and development of so many
novel life-forms.
https://www.discovery.org/a/the-significance-of-phillip-johnson/
https://www.discovery.org/p/meyer/
Due in insults,Nope, you are wrong yet again. There have been quite a few ID
castigation and character assassination, ID proponents are quick to
leave TO.
proponents who were here for many years.
Except me, so far I've been able to overlook it.>>
[...]
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.