Sujet : Re: West Virginia creationism
De : 69jpil69 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (jillery)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 21. May 2024, 06:51:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : What are you looking for?
Message-ID : <iido4j9hmos63lj1r8ea2m81v24ipuhu5e@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 20 May 2024 19:45:09 -0400, Ron Dean
<
rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
By the way, your arguments and claims here are every bit as sound as
your creationist arguments. It's a useful comparison.
>
In my view, it's _Origins_ that's the weakest part of naturalism.
_Origins_ is the weakest part of any narrative, including ID. Or are
you now prepared to explain the _origins_ of your presumptive
purposeful designer?
-- To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge