Re: Wistar Symposium "Mathematical Challenge to Neo-Darwinism".

On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 09:03:54 +0100, Martin Harran
<martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 03:10:42 +0000, *Hemidactylus*
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
>

Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, 2 Jun 2024 11:15:24 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
 
[snip for focus]
 

In my youth I came to accept evolution as a fact. But after reading a
book by Dr Michael Denton, on a challenge, I began to question the
"evidence" for evolution and that's where I am today.

 
When forming my own views on a subject, I always make an effort to
understand the various views on the subject.
>

When someone points to your guru having eugenics based views you belittle
them by comparing them to Ron Dean and when presented with actual evidence
quoted directly from the source you avoid actually deep diving in and
instead tap dance with irrelevancies like the practice of FGM. So much for
understanding those various views that might go against your own
confirmation bias. But go on and lecture Ron Dean on your virtues.

>
That uncontrollable itch playing up again?
>

P.S. I forgot to ask, what was the name of that guy again, the one who
used to irritate people by dragging disagreement in a thread into
other unrelated threads?