Re: Test

On 6/24/24 10:31 AM, Burkhard wrote:

erik simpson wrote:
 

On 6/22/24 4:49 PM, Bob Casanova wrote:

Anybody there? Bueller? Bueller?

 

Yesterday, upon the stair,
I met a man who wasn't there
He wasn't there again today
I wish, I wish he'd go away...

 

When I came home last night at three
The man was waiting there for me
But when I looked around the hall
I couldn't see him there at all!
Go away, go away, don't you come back any more!
Go away, go away, and please don't slam the door... (slam!)

 

Last night I saw upon the stair
A little man who wasn't there
He wasn't there again today
Oh, how I wish he'd go away...

 

- Hughes Mearns

  I wrote a paper about this!
 https://richterzeitung.weblaw.ch/jusletter-it/dam/publicationsystem_leges/fses/16_S_293_320_Schafer.pdf
 see esp. 312 ff
 

Thoughtful paper.  I might suggest a "part D": what is the nature of the law that is to be applied?  Often laws ("created" by elected assemblies) are less than perfectly framed.  They may occasionally be internally inconsistent, or in the United States may be unconstitutional.  The latter case raises the specter of the Supreme Court using either "conservative" or "creative" interpretations.
As a retired computer professional, I am deeply suspicious of AI.  I have never encountered a computer program of sufficient complexity to be interesting that was free of bugs, or at least subject to unexpected output when given unexpected input.