Re: Molecular Dating: The turd that won't go away

On Mon, 01 Jul 2024 13:10:00 +0100, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by "Kerr-Mudd, John"
<admin@127.0.0.1>:

On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 19:48:15 +0100, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
>

  Bob Casanova wrote:
>

Mengele? Moreau? Kevorkian? So many possibilities...

>
Instead of listing your heroes, you might've commented on
the topic... might have... if you weren't a faker.

>
You need to marshal your arguments more clearly.
It's not us who are nym-shifting to spite all your erm interesting posts.
>
PS  It would be better if you snipped less of the context.
>

Since I only see his/her/its "wisdom" when someone else
replies to him/her/it, and he/she/it knows that, it's known
that any comments by the aforementioned entity don't get to
the assumed target.

And the best would be nothing from him/her/it at all; the
average post intelligence would improve somewhat.

>

--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov