Re: ChatGPT contributing to current science papers

  RonO wrote:

The biggest danger, and it does happen, is good science being killed
off by "Peer Review."

 You are just delusional.

No, you're a fucking idiot. Take a look at the work on AIDS epidemic
being created by a vaccine:  Papers/letters "Debunking" it were
published routinely -- though why you'd need to debunk something that
you supposedly already debunked is a mystery. And work that actually
did science and supported the likelihood was squelched. The bad science
was ultimately deposed, and the vaccine origins is still talked about
MAINSTREAM, but much of the good science never saw the light of day.

There are so many journals publishing similar science that

Well you're a fucking idiot. People have to be published, if they
want their cushy jobs, so they post innocuous crap that's totally
safe. Yes. So these "Journals" get flooded with shades of gray,
virtually indistinct garbage.
But we're not talking about the idiotic standards of academia, which
is what creates THAT problem. We're talking about the idiocy that is
peer review.
  peer review is about the last thing that is going to kill

off good science.

And yet it has.
It has let through "Cold Fusion" though, hasn't it?
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5