Re: ChatGPT contributing to current science papers

  RonO wrote:
 

You didn't read

 This isn't a book club, it's a discussion group, and you have
a lengthy history of splattering "Cites" which do not refute
anything you're opposing nor support a goddamn thing you think
you're saying.
 Simple:  If you want to pretend that you read and understood
a "Cite," and that it establishes anything relevant, explain
exactly what you think it establishes, and how.
 Your "Molecular data" is garbage. It's not addressing human
ORIGINS but human DISPERSAL. These are two entirely different
topics.