Re: ChatGPT contributing to current science papers

On 8/15/2024 3:06 PM, JTEM wrote:

  RonO wrote:
 

You do realize that you are admitting that the bogus junk

 You're a religious fundy. You call it "Bogus junk" not because
you're capable of naming a damn thing wrong with it, but
because "So it is written and so it shall be!"  Some bible oops
I mean "Scientific Journal" told you what to think and you
mistaken this for your thinking.
 Go on, continue to delude yourself! I love it. The easiest
way to make me look smart is to post in a group with a
jackass like you.
   

This seems to be projection on your part.  Who seems to be the religious fundy in this case?
Ron Okimoto