The future of intelligent design creationism

Google generative AI produced this overview when I use the thread title to search using Google:
QUOTE:
The future of intelligent design (ID) and creationism is likely to see a decline in the number of cases for which ID is invoked as an explanation, as better evolutionary explanations are developed. This is because ID is not a valid scientific theory, as it cannot be tested or used to make predictions.
Here are some reasons why ID is not considered a valid scientific theory:
Lack of testable predictions
ID proponents point to holes in evolution, but they don't provide details that would allow for scientific testing or predictions.
Unclear boundaries
ID theorists don't clearly define where evolution ends and ID begins.
Lack of evidence
ID proponents point to phenomena like the Cambrian explosion, but they don't provide evidence that these phenomena can't be explained by evolution.
Challenges to the concept of intelligence
Evolutionary algorithms demonstrate that complex structures can evolve through randomness and selection, without the need for a designer.
ID is a pseudoscientific movement that promotes the idea that life is too complex to have evolved without the intervention of a supernatural being.
Generative AI is experimental.
END QUOTE:
Unlike ChatGPT the Google AI seems to post conclusions derived from what it has been fed about intelligent design.  ChatGPT would post the ID perp claims as if they had some validity, but the Google AI seems to have decided not to include the bogus claims, and instead go with the public consensus.
You still get the same search results like the Christian Post article on the future of intelligent design that I have put up a couple times on TO and the older negative commentary by the NCSE.
It should be noted that the first paragraph reflects the fact that there has been 100% failure for god-did-it-explanations in science.  They have never been scientifically testable at the time that they were proposed, and we have had to do the hard work in figuring out what really happened or is going on.  The earth isn't flat, there is no firmament above us, the geocentric universe does not exist, the earth is much older than creationist literalistic claims, no global flood, the order of creation is wrong.  100% failure and no god-did-it successes.  Nothing that we have been able to verify as a possible god-did-it success has ever gone onto the god's side of the ledger upon verification.  The Google AI is able to take what has been happening and predict a likely future for the ID scam.  The ID perps and IDiotic creationists that fell for the ID scam have never been able to do that.
I do not know what triggers these google AI summaries.  They might only occur if the AI has enough input to compose something.
Ron Okimoto