The best evidence for the ID scam

https://evolutionnews.org/2024/08/william-dembski-whats-the-best-evidence-for-intelligent-design/
The Discotute thread had the claim that Bechly was the only ID perp left standing in his support for the creationist ID scam at the Discovery Institute.
Luskin put out the Top Six back in 2017 and claimed that other ID perps had been involved in picking them out.  There were obvious dissenters and Sewell removed Behe's IC flagellum, and the Cambrian explosion gap denial and Miller removed the Big Bang.
Klinghoffer likely doesn't like the fact that they were put up in their order of occurrence, so he is putting up what individual IDiots are claiming as the best one.  There are links to the articles Klinghoffer is talking about.
Dembski wants to go with the genetic machinery that is part of the #3 The origin of life Top Six entry. and the two other creationists want to go with #2 Fine tuning.  Neither is support for the existence of an intelligent designer.  It seems sad that the bait and switch has been going down for over 2 decades and this is the best that they can come up with.  They need to do some validation and testing.  They need to figure out some means to determine if intelligent design was even involved in things like fine tuning when all that we know is that things just are the way that they are, and if some physical constants were different, things would be different.  The two IDiots claiming fine tuning claim that they can eliminate all other viable options leaving only intelligent design (god did it) as the explanation.  What kind of whack job would think that, that could be done?  That is the quality of their argument.  Such stupidity only passes peer review among IDiots.
Ron Okimoto