Re: Past TO post links

On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 21:47:54 +0000, erik simpson wrote:

On 9/25/24 12:24 PM, *Hemidactylus* wrote:

erik simpson <eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/24/24 5:53 PM, *Hemidactylus* wrote:

erik simpson <eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:

On 9/24/24 6:15 AM, jillery wrote:

On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:18:16 -0700, erik simpson
<eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:
>

With all that data, you could compile a book of Peter's contributions.

>
>
Or your's.
>
>

Ugh. Ugh. Ugh.

>
>
I could do that, but to what end?
>
--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge
>

I should have "one could compile a book".  But I wouldn't suggest that
anybody should.
>

There’s enough online to generate an AI version (a mindclone). Imagine
how
fun that might be.
>

An AI version of Peter (or me)?  Even more ughs.
>

An AI Erik might be interesting.
>

Artificial intelligence is better than none.

[3rd try]
Not sure I agree, as AI tends to be artificial parroting.
Be that as it may, and be this talk.origins, this suggest creation
of a bot that responds with fragments or mash-ups of Python sketches.
It would have to use ... sarcasm, all the tricks, dramatic irony,
metaphor, pathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire.
It would have to be vicious.