Sujet : Re: Censorship
De : admin (at) *nospam* 127.0.0.1 (Kerr-Mudd, John)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 09. Oct 2024, 10:46:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Dis
Message-ID : <20241009104607.9010f55719ea3e1b18bb7367@127.0.0.1>
References : 1
User-Agent : Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:52:15 -0400
JTEM <
jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
Remember when censorship was bad?
I was always against moderation because moderation can't
increase the number of conversation that you want. It
can only stop conversation that you're not tolerant of.
And it's always abused.
Like now.
Whachyaonnabout now? Did you try to post something even more
nonsensical than usual? In which case you need to complain^w take your
case to an unmoderated group. In the UK we have u.n.n.m for trolls to moan
about how they can't troll properly any more.
-- Bah, and indeed Humbug.
Censorship
Re: Censorship