Re: politics

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: politics
De : martinharran (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Martin Harran)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 11. Dec 2024, 14:08:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <me3jlj5ddkee9calbgruahf1g62es8gt9s@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:32:09 +0000, "Kerr-Mudd, John"
<admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:02:23 -0500
jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 10:34:40 +0000, Martin Harran
<martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
 
On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 02:23:51 +0000, *Hemidactylus*
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
>
Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 10:05:40 -0800, erik simpson
<eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:
 
On 11/17/24 9:25 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:13:43 -0800, erik simpson
<eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:
 
I'd like to propose a moratorium on political posts, as they are
off-topic.  I see general agreement on the unsatisfactory state of
affairs here in the US, but for now there's little anybody can do about it.
 
You'd prefer it to be essentially a Ron O blog?
 
That's what it's pretty well been this last while :(
 
Ron's been standing clear of electoral politics.  In fact, if he's the
most prolific poster, good for him.
 
Sorry, I meant to reply to this but it slipped by me.
 
Just to be clear, I have no problem at all with Ron's posting on the
Dairy Flu - on the contrary, that is the sort of stuff that he excels
at and I find his contributions highly valuable even if focused mostly
on the USA as there will be an inevitable knock-on this side of the
Atlantic.
 
My point was that recently, he has really been the only poster here …
unless you want to consider JTEM as a useful poster!
 
Ron scares the shit out of me on a regular basis and for that I thank him.
>
I don’t know if we’ve been able to rebound from the welcome demise of GG.
>
I do miss more frequent input from Lawyer Daggett and Burkhard. I think
they had both used novaBBS as an alternative means.
>
Ron Dean has returned. That’s gotta be better than JTEM, right?
>
So has MarkE. Coincidence?
>
One way or another, hopefully they will generate a bit more activity
than has been here since the end of GG.
 
 
You conflate smoke with substance.  Both MarkE and RDean are likely to
provide the latest rounds of deja vu all over again, where they repost
the same old arguments without acknowledging the answers they were
>
You are vindicated.
>
Also Martin Harran is reviving some historical debate about how Galileo was treated.

In regard to ID/Creationism/Religion v Science generally, I'd  happily
bet that nothing new has been added in the last 5-10 years, it is
*all* old stuff revisited.

Anyway, as previously pointed out to you, reading these threads is not
compulsory and, if you don't think they are worthwhile fare for TO,
you could always post something else yourself.


>
given before.  I suppose that's better than mindless trolls from J***
enablers, but not by much.
 
Mindlessness is in the eye of the beholder.
>
JTEM's "debating style" is quite off-putting. Looks like he has troubles and projects them on anyone responding.
>
At least David Dalton is out to improve the world, in his own curious way.
>
And I imagine I'm just seen as sniping from the sidelines.
Not much new to see here, move along.
>
US Electoral troubles are behind us; it's now all about the fallout (I hope not literally). </gloom>


Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Nov 24 * politics55erik simpson
17 Nov 24 +* Re: politics29Martin Harran
17 Nov 24 i+* Re: politics23erik simpson
17 Nov 24 ii+* Re: politics6*Hemidactylus*
18 Nov 24 iii+* Re: politics2erik simpson
18 Nov 24 iiii`- Re: politics1RonO
19 Nov 24 iii`* Re: politics3jillery
19 Nov 24 iii `* Re: politics2RonO
20 Nov 24 iii  `- Re: politics1jillery
7 Dec 24 ii`* Re: politics16Martin Harran
7 Dec 24 ii +* Re: politics2jillery
7 Dec 24 ii i`- Re: politics1JTEM
9 Dec 24 ii `* Re: politics13*Hemidactylus*
9 Dec 24 ii  `* Re: politics12Martin Harran
9 Dec 24 ii   `* Re: politics11jillery
9 Dec 24 ii    +* Re: politics2erik simpson
9 Dec 24 ii    i`- Re: politics1Martin Harran
11 Dec 24 ii    `* Re: politics8Kerr-Mudd, John
11 Dec 24 ii     +* Re: politics6Martin Harran
18 Dec12:36 ii     i+- Re: politics1jillery
20 Dec15:07 ii     i`* Re: politics4Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Dec17:15 ii     i +* Re: politics2erik simpson
21 Dec14:19 ii     i i`- Re: politics1JTEM
21 Dec12:39 ii     i `- Re: politics1jillery
18 Dec12:38 ii     `- Re: politics1jillery
17 Nov 24 i+* Re: politics4Kerr-Mudd, John
17 Nov 24 ii`* Re: politics3*Hemidactylus*
18 Nov 24 ii `* Re: politics2erik simpson
19 Nov 24 ii  `- Re: politics1jillery
18 Nov 24 i`- Re: politics1RonO
17 Nov 24 +- Re: politics1Bob Casanova
17 Nov 24 +- Re: politics1JTEM
18 Nov 24 +* Re: politics22J. J. Lodder
18 Nov 24 i`* Re: politics21erik simpson
18 Nov 24 i +* Re: politics3RonO
18 Nov 24 i i+- Re: politics1erik simpson
18 Nov 24 i i`- Re: politics1Kestrel Clayton
18 Nov 24 i `* Re: politics17Bob Casanova
18 Nov 24 i  +* Re: politics10J. J. Lodder
18 Nov 24 i  i+* Re: politics4Kestrel Clayton
18 Nov 24 i  ii`* Re: politics3J. J. Lodder
19 Nov 24 i  ii `* Re: politics2William Hyde
19 Nov 24 i  ii  `- Re: politics1jillery
18 Nov 24 i  i+* Re: politics4Athel Cornish-Bowden
19 Nov 24 i  ii+* Re: politics2J. J. Lodder
19 Nov 24 i  iii`- Re: politics1*Hemidactylus*
22 Nov 24 i  ii`- Re: politics1Rufus Ruffian
19 Nov 24 i  i`- Re: politics1Bob Casanova
18 Nov 24 i  `* Re: politics6*Hemidactylus*
18 Nov 24 i   +- Re: politics1J. J. Lodder
18 Nov 24 i   `* Re: politics4Athel Cornish-Bowden
19 Nov 24 i    `* Re: politics3jillery
19 Nov 24 i     `* Re: politics2*Hemidactylus*
19 Nov 24 i      `- Re: politics1Athel Cornish-Bowden
19 Nov 24 `- Re: politics1jillery

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal