Re: Top three reasons for optimism about the ID scam

On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 13:27:08 -0600, RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 12/30/2024 4:07 AM, jillery wrote:

On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 16:30:50 +0000, Martin Harran
<martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
 

On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 09:38:20 -0600, RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>
wrote:
>

On 12/29/2024 2:59 AM, jillery wrote:

On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 13:33:45 +0000, Martin Harran
<martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
>

I'm not going to repost all the crap you keep reposting

>
>
For a refreshing change of pace, follow your own advice and KF "you".
>

>
I do not interact with Harran very much, but how long has he been likely
insane?  You seem to have more experience with him.  How insane do you
have to be to simply lie about something insane that you have been doing
throughout the thread?  How insane do you have to be in order to think
that removing the evidence means that it doesn't matter?  I know that
snipping and running is a common dishonest ploy that posters like Nyikos
would routinely indulge in, but Harran doesn't seem to be mentally aware
of what he is doing.

>
The best example I see of insanity here is somebody with scientific
expertise who dismisses the documented conclusions of qualified
researchers in favour of some guy trying to make a case for
geocentrism.

 
 
Once again, follow your own advice...
 

>
Projection is something I do not understand. 

But something that you are particularly good at. Trying to lable your
opponents as insane is just about the worst possible argument you
could use and shows more about your own lack of reasoning than your
opponent's.

Nyikos would do it
routinely.  If he was doing something stupid and dishonest someone else
had to be guilty of doing it.  What I do not get is that the person
doing it obviously understands what they are doing well enough to accuse
someone else of doing it instead of themselves.  Here Harran is the one
that can't deal with the evidence even when it comes from his own
trusted source, and his means of dealing with it is to remove it and run
in denial.  I have been the one putting up the evidence, and he has been
the one that can't deal with the conclusions of the people that have
written up their evaluation of the incidents.
>
Ron Okimoto