Sujet : Re: 2nd law clarifications
De : nospam (at) *nospam* buzz.off (Bob Casanova)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 11. Jan 2025, 06:48:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ma14ojtiupmvci9kqlaa98sdo7ovfj5q39@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 18:42:14 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by
j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com(LDagget):
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:23:53 +0000, Ernest Major wrote:
>
On 10/01/2025 12:18, MarkE wrote:
>
As I noted previously, where one draws the system boundary is critical
in this analysis. I agree that the contribution of energy released
during polymerization needs to be considered as well.
>
If the result depends on where you draw the boundary would that not be
an indication that there's something wrong with the analysis.
>
Yes.
>
Also, IIRC from my undergrad days, the 2nd Law applies to
all systems. It simply requires that *all* energy exchanges
be included.
>
-- Bob C."The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
2nd law clarifications
Re: 2nd law clarifications
