Sujet : Re: Baminornis zhenghensis
De : richZIG.e.clayZIGton (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Kestrel Clayton)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 14. Feb 2025, 17:57:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vonsml$3i7n1$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 14-Feb-25 10:05, RonO wrote:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/scientists-discover- groundbreaking-jurassic-fossil-that-could-overhaul-the-evolutionary- history-of-birds-180986063/
This fossil was discovered in 2023, and seems to have some features that make it more like modern birds than Archaeopteryx. It is supposed to have lived around the same time as Archaeopteryx. It looks like the bones that they have would make a shorter tail, but do they have all the tail bones. It is difficult to tell from the pictures of the bones, but the bones that they do show do not have the fragmentary squashed fused tail like structure of modern birds.
That's very interesting. Am I wrong for thinking this may imply the ancestry of early birds, much like early Homo, is a lot "bushier" than previously believed?
-- [The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.]Kestrel Clayton"Every normal woman must be tempted, at times, to stoke the fire,host the black mass, and begin eating hearts." — Rose Bailey