Sujet : Re: To sum up
De : martinharran (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Martin Harran)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 18. Feb 2025, 18:49:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <cjh9rjl9mc3j6ofgovb02noeffcrdnlel1@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:59:54 +0000, Martin Harran
<
martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:41:42 +1100, MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On 18/02/2025 8:55 pm, Martin Harran wrote:
[...]
I'm with many ID proponents who are openly Christians, but in the
context of debating the interpretation and implications of scientific
evidence, deliberately and correctly refer only to a non-specific
intelligent designer interacting with this material world from outside
of spacetime.
>
Why do you feel the need to hide your religious beliefs; why not just
come out and talk openly about God? That seems to me a lack of
confidence in your religious beliefs or at least your ability to
convince other people.
Meant to add to above that I think there is an inherent subterfuge if
not outright dishonesty in what you and your fellow ID travellers are
doing; the very last thing you would want is for somebody to find
evidence of a designer who is not the Christian God - that would
probably be even worse for you than evolution being shown to be true.
I think Christians trying to promote their beliefs using subterfuge
are acting contrary to Christian principles and, whilst they might
have some limited short-term success, they will ultimately do more
harm than good to the spreading of Christian belief. That is why I get
so annoyed with this and come across as hostile to it.