Re: To sum up

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: To sum up
De : martinharran (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Martin Harran)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 18. Feb 2025, 18:49:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <cjh9rjl9mc3j6ofgovb02noeffcrdnlel1@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:59:54 +0000, Martin Harran
<martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:41:42 +1100, MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On 18/02/2025 8:55 pm, Martin Harran wrote:


[...]


I'm with many ID proponents who are openly Christians, but in the
context of debating the interpretation and implications of scientific
evidence, deliberately and correctly refer only to a non-specific
intelligent designer interacting with this material world from outside
of spacetime.
>
Why do you feel the need to hide your religious beliefs; why not just
come out and talk openly about God? That seems to me a lack of
confidence in your religious beliefs or at least your ability to
convince other people.

Meant to add to above that I think there is an inherent subterfuge if
not outright dishonesty in what you and your fellow ID travellers are
doing; the very last thing you would want is for somebody to find
evidence of a designer who is not the Christian God - that would
probably be even worse for you than evolution being shown to be true.

I think Christians trying to promote their beliefs using subterfuge
are acting contrary to Christian principles and, whilst they might
have some limited short-term success, they will ultimately do more
harm than good to the spreading of Christian belief. That is why I get
so annoyed with this and come across as hostile to it.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Feb 25 * To sum up88MarkE
6 Feb 25 +* Re: To sum up46Ernest Major
6 Feb 25 i+- Re: To sum up1Martin Harran
7 Feb 25 i`* Re: To sum up44MarkE
7 Feb 25 i +* Re: To sum up3JTEM
7 Feb 25 i i+- Re: To sum up1MarkE
7 Feb 25 i i`- Re: To sum up1MarkE
8 Feb 25 i `* Re: To sum up40Ernest Major
8 Feb 25 i  `* Re: To sum up39MarkE
15 Feb 25 i   `* Re: To sum up38Mark Isaak
15 Feb 25 i    +* Re: To sum up5MarkE
15 Feb 25 i    i+- Re: To sum up1Martin Harran
23 Feb 25 i    i`* Re: To sum up3Mark Isaak
23 Feb 25 i    i `* Re: To sum up2Ernest Major
23 Feb 25 i    i  `- Re: To sum up1DB Cates
15 Feb 25 i    `* Re: To sum up32MarkE
15 Feb 25 i     +- Re: To sum up1Martin Harran
15 Feb 25 i     `* Re: To sum up30jillery
17 Feb 25 i      +* Re: To sum up28MarkE
17 Feb 25 i      i+* Re: To sum up5Ernest Major
18 Feb 25 i      ii+* Re: To sum up3MarkE
18 Feb 25 i      iii+- Re: To sum up1Martin Harran
18 Feb 25 i      iii`- Re: To sum up1Ernest Major
18 Feb 25 i      ii`- Re: To sum up1MarkE
18 Feb 25 i      i+* Re: To sum up21Martin Harran
18 Feb 25 i      ii`* Re: To sum up20MarkE
18 Feb 25 i      ii +* Re: To sum up18Martin Harran
18 Feb 25 i      ii i`* Re: To sum up17MarkE
18 Feb 25 i      ii i +* Re: To sum up3Bob Casanova
18 Feb 25 i      ii i i+- Re: To sum up1Kestrel Clayton
23 Feb 25 i      ii i i`- Re: To sum up1Bob Casanova
18 Feb 25 i      ii i `* Re: To sum up13Martin Harran
18 Feb 25 i      ii i  +- Re: To sum up1Martin Harran
18 Feb 25 i      ii i  `* Re: To sum up11MarkE
19 Feb 25 i      ii i   +* Re: To sum up3Martin Harran
19 Feb 25 i      ii i   i`* Re: To sum up2MarkE
20 Feb 25 i      ii i   i `- Re: To sum up1Martin Harran
20 Feb 25 i      ii i   `* Re: To sum up7Martin Harran
20 Feb 25 i      ii i    +* Re: To sum up4Ernest Major
20 Feb 25 i      ii i    i`* Re: To sum up3Martin Harran
21 Feb 25 i      ii i    i `* Re: To sum up2MarkE
21 Feb 25 i      ii i    i  `- Re: To sum up1Martin Harran
21 Feb 25 i      ii i    `* Re: To sum up2MarkE
21 Feb 25 i      ii i     `- Re: To sum up1Martin Harran
18 Feb 25 i      ii `- Re: To sum up1Ernest Major
24 Feb 25 i      i`- Re: To sum up1Mark Isaak
17 Feb 25 i      `- Re: To sum up1MarkE
6 Feb 25 +* Re: To sum up33Martin Harran
8 Feb 25 i`* Re: To sum up32Martin Harran
8 Feb 25 i `* Re: To sum up31MarkE
8 Feb 25 i  +* Re: To sum up9Martin Harran
9 Feb 25 i  i`* Re: To sum up8MarkE
9 Feb 25 i  i `* Re: To sum up7Martin Harran
9 Feb 25 i  i  +* Re: To sum up4MarkE
15 Feb 25 i  i  i`* Re: To sum up3Martin Harran
15 Feb 25 i  i  i `* Re: To sum up2MarkE
15 Feb 25 i  i  i  `- Re: To sum up1Martin Harran
9 Feb 25 i  i  `* Re: To sum up2MarkE
9 Feb 25 i  i   `- Re: To sum up1Martin Harran
8 Feb 25 i  `* Re: To sum up21Bob Casanova
11 Feb 25 i   `* Re: To sum up20Bob Casanova
11 Feb 25 i    `* Re: To sum up19MarkE
12 Feb 25 i     +* Re: To sum up7Bob Casanova
13 Feb 25 i     i+* Re: To sum up4MarkE
13 Feb 25 i     ii`* Re: To sum up3Bob Casanova
14 Feb 25 i     ii `* Re: To sum up2MarkE
15 Feb 25 i     ii  `- Re: To sum up1Bob Casanova
13 Feb 25 i     i`* Re: To sum up2William Hyde
14 Feb 25 i     i `- Re: To sum up1MarkE
12 Feb 25 i     `* Re: To sum up11jillery
13 Feb 25 i      `* Re: To sum up10MarkE
13 Feb 25 i       +* Re: To sum up3jillery
13 Feb 25 i       i`* Re: To sum up2MarkE
14 Feb 25 i       i `- Re: To sum up1jillery
14 Feb 25 i       `* Re: To sum up6Martin Harran
14 Feb 25 i        +- Re: To sum up1jillery
15 Feb 25 i        `* Re: To sum up4Martin Harran
15 Feb 25 i         `* Re: To sum up3jillery
15 Feb 25 i          `* Re: To sum up2Kerr-Mudd, John
16 Feb 25 i           `- Re: To sum up1jillery
6 Feb 25 +* Re: To sum up3JTEM
7 Feb 25 i+- Re: To sum up1MarkE
7 Feb 25 i`- Re: To sum up1MarkE
6 Feb 25 +- Re: To sum up1RonO
7 Feb 25 +- Re: To sum up1Kerr-Mudd, John
19 Feb 25 `* Re: To sum up3jillery
19 Feb 25  +- Re: To sum up1Kerr-Mudd, John
23 Feb 25  `- Re: To sum up1jillery

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal