Re: Venduti 10 lotti di ghiaccio e terra su Marte

On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 20:50:45 -0500, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com>:

On Feb 26, 2025, Bob Casanova wrote
(in article<lciurj55mg82shft75gn76195ea3asaagj@4ax.com>):
>

On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 19:00:26 -0500, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by WolfFan<akwolffan@zoho.com>:
>

On Feb 22, 2025, E.Laureti wrote
(in article <vpburo$3rool$1@dont-email.me>):
>

>
Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>  posted:
>

On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 18:39:34 GMT, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by E.Laureti
<user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid>:
Step eento my leetle file...
>
<plonk>

>
Venduti 10 Lotti di ghiaccio e terra su Marte
>
In www.asps.it/korolevTorta.jpg
>
>
Da "c***** s***** " *******@gmail.com
A asps@asps.it
Cc
Data Mon, 17 Feb 2025 18:44:35 +0100
Oggetto Fwd: Hai inviato un pagamento (by PayPal www.asps.it/aliena.htm )
>
>
Ciao Emidio,
>
avevo deciso di comprare un pezzo da 160 mq, poi parlandone a casa,
siccome siamo un gruppo di dieci, mi hanno suggerito di prendere 10 pezzi
da 16 mq, confinanti tra loro verso il centro sul raggio 270. Adesso mi
dovete dire se basta il nome e cognome oppure se servono altre
informazioni.
>
Ti invio in calce la ricevuta di pagamento.
>
Saluti
>
C********** S**************
>
>
>
From: E.Laureti
>
Ottimo .... ne darò info sul prossimo numero di Nova Astronautica e ti
dirò meglio i dettagli in seguito.
>
In più te ne darò altri gratuitamente per la tua audacia!
>
Ma devo controllare tutto meglio nella zona dove il ghiacciaio del
>
Korolev su Marte dove il ghiaccio è più spesso e dove di possono
scavare
orizzontalmente gallerie
>
Ad Astra
>
>
>
Emidio
>
>
Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit
>
www.asps.it

>
www.asps.it/lottimarziani.jpg
>
www.asps.it

>
So... you finally reply. But you _still_ can’t lift even one kilogramme
even one metre. And you never will.

He didn't "reply" to anything I wrote. And unless the
referenced photo is intended as a claim that he got there
with his Magic Drive(tm), it means nothing at all WRT his
claims.

>
he can’t lift one kilo one meter. he’s got nothing, and knows it. I’ve
seen this nonsense before. It’s the Dean Drive, warmed over.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_drive and just like Norman Dean, m’man
refuses to let anyone get too close to his ‘invention’.
>

Yep.

Note that I did say "claim". Claims, no matter how
ridiculous, are easy; all one needs is an imagination and
oversized cojones. Evidence is a bit more rigorous.

And yeah, the claimed *effect* does sound like the Dean
Drive, but is he claiming that his magical thingie converts
rotational momentum to linear momentum, as Dean did?

>

--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov