Re: What points to the ID scam?

On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 14:27:05 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

 Bob Casanova wrote:
>

talk.origins, posted by erik simpson

>

I've never understood the need for the ID proponents to prove that
evolution is wrong.  Certainly God could have done it that way, and do
they actually assert that he couldn't? My brother in law is a YEC, and
doesn't accept the larger God that can play with billions of years.
>

That supports the idea that "Man created God in his own
image". It's neither logically consistent (given that belief
usually involves a deity more capable than His believers)

>
Are you honestly this stupid?
>
"As the extremely close genetic cousin to a Chimpanzee, I know exactly

*Exactly* may actually be the crux of the matter.

how an all seeing, all knowing, all powerful creator God living outside
of space & time would act.

So, when this god of which you speak is included in the discussion all
reasoning should stop and be replaced with "Trust and believe -- trust
and obey" and no further discussion is possible.

And if I don't see the actions I would choose
as the extremely close genetic cousin to a Chimpanzee, that proves God
doesn't exist."

What actions are you talking about?

It's called "Narcissism."
>
Look it up.

Weren't you into narcissism a ways back?

You're not even emotional capable of accepting the fact that Darwin was
a fraud, you're so wrecked, but God would have to think like you? Act in
a way that you mistaken for logic?