Liste des Groupes | Revenir à t origins |
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:31:30 -0500, DB Cates <cates_db@hotmail.com>I'm having difficulty reconciling that view with a purported omniscient entity.
wrote:
On 2025-03-17 8:31 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:Thank you for that. I had to stop snipping replies to Ron because ifOn Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:42:49 -0500, RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>[giant snip]
wrote:
>
you snip anything at all, he claims you were running from his
arguments and reposts the same stuff so you end up with a post 2 or 3
times longer than it needs to be :(
I see this as a background thing, not a direct process. I have 5>>>
QUOTE:
We believe that God acts purposefully in creation, just as he does in
our lives, and that he continues to actively uphold and sustain creation.
END QUOTE:
And again, nothing there about God tweaking life the way Behe claims.
[another giant snip]
Out of curiosity, what do you think the phrase "he continues to actively
uphold and sustain creation." mean? I mean, in particular "continues"
and "actively".
grown-up children, all with children of their own. I continue to
actively uphold and sustain them in whatever way they need but I do
not *interfere* in their lives. If, for example, they make decisions
that I don't agree with, I *might* offer an opinion if I think it will
be welcome but the decision is entirely theirs and I fully accept and
support whatever they do decide. The help and support I (and my wife)
give them is on request, not pushed on them, though they know it is
available when needed, and is given unconditionally.
That's why I think the analogy of God as father is a particularly apt
one.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.