Sujet : Re: How To Teach Evolution To A Creationist
De : richZIG.e.clayZIGton (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Kestrel Clayton)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 29. Mar 2025, 16:04:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vs9253$1i9n0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 29-Mar-25 01:55, jillery wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 23:15:34 -0400, Kestrel Clayton
<richZIG.e.clayZIGton@gmail.com> wrote:
On 28-Mar-25 20:02, jillery wrote:
>
[ other stuff snipped ]
>
Mentioning skin color is a such a blatant no-no nowadays, that only
the most clueless would evoke it. OTOH T.O. has seen more subtle
versions of that line of reasoning, ex. gaslighting transgenders,
atheists, and other POVs different from their own.
>
Just FYI, most transgender people prefer to be described as, well,
"transgender people." Or "transgender folks," if you like. The thinking
is describing minoritized folks with just an adjective ("transgenders,"
"Blacks," et cetera) can be a bit dehumanizing.
>
Thanks!
>
[ also snipping the rest of your post, with apologies ]
Ok, no insult meant, none taken.
I knew you didn't mean any insult! And I was not insulted. Just offering a little tip on how the use of the word has... dare I say it... EVOLVED a bit.
[sound of crickets]
... I'll show myself out...
OTOH gaslighting transgender people is dehumanizing.
Thank you for being kind and thoughtful. I appreciate it.
-- [The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.]Kestrel Clayton"Every normal woman must be tempted, at times, to stoke the fire,host the black mass, and begin eating hearts." — Rose Bailey