Re: evolution ?

On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 09:03:23 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:18:12 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com
(LDagget):
>

On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 0:09:34 +0000, Bob Casanova wrote:
>

On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 07:22:11 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com
(LDagget):

>

A lack of semantic filtering seems like a good diagnostic of
some challenging neurological conditions. Are the incongruities
not noticed? Noticed but not filtered?
>
It might all seem like navel gazing if it weren't for some very
significant examples of semantic incongruities frequently
spewing forth from Executive Functionaries with little apparent
executive function (non-functioning filters). Bigly.
>

Biden's gone, let him rest in peace.

>
Fair game I suppose
>

;-)

>
, and I'm disinclined to wage a political
proxy fight here. But I will ask you to consider two potential
hells where one is sentenced to diagramming the sentences of
46 or 47. One is infamous for verbal gaffs but that's in part
because they can be found amidst a mostly coherent background.
Moreover, one recognizes when they verbally stumble while the
other plays cover-up games and blames those who noticed.
You may have a last word if you feel the need, I won't continue.
>

Nah; political "discussions" never go anywhere but down, and
are off-topic here anyway.

So it's ok for you to start off-topic political "discussions".  So
much for your "no worries" advice to Kestrel.

Have a good rest of the week, and a good weekend.

>

--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge