Re: supernatural ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: supernatural ?
De : Taiger (at) *nospam* invalid.org
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 19. Apr 2025, 01:56:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Forte - www.forteinc.com
Message-ID : <s1t50ktkes3lru1cj8eek8o2lt94g7b1s3@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 13:37:01 -0400, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

 Taiger@invalid.org wrote:
>
One person's supernatural is another's natural.
>
No.
>
Add the word "Perception," as in "One person's PERCEPTION
of the supernatural is..." and you could be correct.
>
But you're obfuscating. You're trying to block discussion
by inventing ambiguity.
>
Naughty.

Oh. Thanks for explaning to me what I meant with what I said.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Apr 25 * Re: supernatural ?4Taiger
18 Apr 25 `* Re: supernatural ?3JTEM
19 Apr 25  `* Re: supernatural ?2Taiger
19 Apr 25   `- Re: supernatural ?1JTEM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal